Execution
NautilusTrader can handle trade execution and order management for multiple strategies and venues simultaneously (per instance). Several interacting components are involved in execution, making it crucial to understand the possible flows of execution messages (commands and events).
The main execution-related components include:
Strategy
ExecAlgorithm
(execution algorithms)OrderEmulator
RiskEngine
ExecutionEngine
orLiveExecutionEngine
ExecutionClient
orLiveExecutionClient
Execution flow
The Strategy
base class inherits from Actor
and so contains all of the common data related
methods. It also provides methods for managing orders and trade execution:
submit_order(...)
submit_order_list(...)
modify_order(...)
cancel_order(...)
cancel_orders(...)
cancel_all_orders(...)
close_position(...)
close_all_positions(...)
query_order(...)
These methods create the necessary execution commands under the hood and send them on the message
bus to the relevant components (point-to-point), as well as publishing any events (such as the
initialization of new orders i.e. OrderInitialized
events).
The general execution flow looks like the following (each arrow indicates movement across the message bus):
Strategy
-> OrderEmulator
-> ExecAlgorithm
-> RiskEngine
-> ExecutionEngine
-> ExecutionClient
The OrderEmulator
and ExecAlgorithm
(s) components are optional in the flow, depending on
individual order parameters (as explained below).
This diagram illustrates message flow (commands and events) across the Nautilus execution components.
┌───────────────────┐
│ │
│ │
│ │
┌───────► OrderEmulator ├────────────┐
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
┌─────────┴──┐ └─────▲──────┬──────┘ │
│ │ │ │ ┌───────▼────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ ├──────────┼──────┼───────────► ├───► ├───► │
│ Strategy │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ RiskEngine │ │ ExecutionEngine │ │ ExecutionClient │
│ ◄──────────┼──────┼───────────┤ ◄───┤ ◄───┤ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
└─────────┬──┘ ┌─────┴──────▼──────┐ └───────▲────────┘ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
└───────► ExecAlgorithm ├────────────┘
│ │
│ │
│ │
└───────────────────┘
Order Management System (OMS)
An order management system (OMS) type refers to the method used for assigning orders to positions and tracking those positions for an instrument.
OMS types apply to both strategies and venues (simulated and real). Even if a venue doesn't explicitly
state the method in use, an OMS type is always in effect. The OMS type for a component can be specified
using the OmsType
enum.
The OmsType
enum has three variants:
UNSPECIFIED
: The OMS type defaults based on where it is applied (details below)NETTING
: Positions are combined into a single position per instrument IDHEDGING
: Multiple positions per instrument ID are supported (both long and short)
The table below describes different configuration combinations and their applicable scenarios.
When the strategy and venue OMS types differ, the ExecutionEngine
handles this by overriding or assigning position_id
values for received OrderFilled
events.
A "virtual position" refers to a position ID that exists within the Nautilus system but not on the venue in
reality.
Strategy OMS | Venue OMS | Description |
---|---|---|
NETTING | NETTING | The strategy uses the venues native OMS type, with a single position ID per instrument ID. |
HEDGING | HEDGING | The strategy uses the venues native OMS type, with multiple position IDs per instrument ID (both LONG and SHORT ). |
NETTING | HEDGING | The strategy overrides the venues native OMS type. The venue tracks multiple positions per instrument ID, but Nautilus maintains a single position ID. |
HEDGING | NETTING | The strategy overrides the venues native OMS type. The venue tracks a single position per instrument ID, but Nautilus maintains multiple position IDs. |
Configuring OMS types separately for strategies and venues increases platform complexity but allows for a wide range of trading styles and preferences (see below).
OMS config examples:
- Most cryptocurrency exchanges use a
NETTING
OMS type, representing a single position per market. It may be desirable for a trader to track multiple "virtual" positions for a strategy. - Some FX ECNs or brokers use a
HEDGING
OMS type, tracking multiple positions bothLONG
andSHORT
. The trader may only care about the NET position per currency pair.
Nautilus does not yet support venue-side hedging modes such as Binance BOTH
vs. LONG/SHORT
where the venue nets per direction.
It is advised to keep Binance account configurations as BOTH
so that a single position is netted.
OMS configuration
If a strategy OMS type is not explicitly set using the oms_type
configuration option,
it will default to UNSPECIFIED
. This means the ExecutionEngine
will not override any venue position_id
s,
and the OMS type will follow the venue's OMS type.
When configuring a backtest, you can specify the oms_type
for the venue. To enhance backtest
accuracy, it is recommended to match this with the actual OMS type used by the venue in practice.
Risk engine
The RiskEngine
is a core component of every Nautilus system, including backtest, sandbox, and live environments.
Every order command and event passes through the RiskEngine
unless specifically bypassed in the RiskEngineConfig
.
The RiskEngine
includes several built-in pre-trade risk checks, including:
- Price precisions correct for the instrument
- Prices are positive (unless an option type instrument)
- Quantity precisions correct for the instrument
- Below maximum notional for the instrument
- Within maximum or minimum quantity for the instrument
- Only reducing position when a
reduce_only
execution instruction is specified for the order
If any risk check fails, an OrderDenied
event is generated, effectively closing the order and
preventing it from progressing further. This event includes a human-readable reason for the denial.
Trading state
Additionally, the current trading state of a Nautilus system affects order flow.
The TradingState
enum has three variants:
ACTIVE
: The system operates normallyHALTED
: The system will not process further order commands until the state changesREDUCING
: The system will only process cancels or commands that reduce open positions
See the RiskEngineConfig
API Reference for further details.
Execution algorithms
The platform supports customized execution algorithm components and provides some built-in algorithms, such as the Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) algorithm.
TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price)
The TWAP execution algorithm aims to execute orders by evenly spreading them over a specified time horizon. The algorithm receives a primary order representing the total size and direction then splits this by spawning smaller child orders, which are then executed at regular intervals throughout the time horizon.
This helps to reduce the impact of the full size of the primary order on the market, by minimizing the concentration of trade size at any given time.
The algorithm will immediately submit the first order, with the final order submitted being the primary order at the end of the horizon period.
Using the TWAP algorithm as an example (found in /examples/algorithms/twap.py
), this example
demonstrates how to initialize and register a TWAP execution algorithm directly with a
BacktestEngine
(assuming an engine is already initialized):
from nautilus_trader.examples.strategies.ema_cross_twap import EMACrossTWAP
from nautilus_trader.examples.strategies.ema_cross_twap import EMACrossTWAPConfig
# Instantiate and add your execution algorithm
exec_algorithm = TWAPExecAlgorithm()
engine.add_exec_algorithm(exec_algorithm)
For this particular algorithm, two parameters must be specified:
horizon_secs
interval_secs
The horizon_secs
parameter determines the time period over which the algorithm will execute, while
the interval_secs
parameter sets the time between individual order executions. These parameters
determine how a primary order is split into a series of spawned orders.
# Configure your strategy
config = EMACrossTWAPConfig(
instrument_id=ETHUSDT_BINANCE.id,
bar_type=BarType.from_str("ETHUSDT.BINANCE-250-TICK-LAST-INTERNAL"),
trade_size=Decimal("0.05"),
fast_ema_period=10,
slow_ema_period=20,
twap_horizon_secs=10.0, # <-- execution algorithm param
twap_interval_secs=2.5, # <-- execution algorithm param
)
# Instantiate and add your strategy
strategy = EMACrossTWAP(config=config)
Alternatively, you can specify these parameters dynamically per order, determining them based on actual market conditions. In this case, the strategy configuration parameters could be provided to an execution model which determines the horizon and interval.
There is no limit to the number of execution algorithm parameters you can create. The parameters just need to be a dictionary with string keys and primitive values (values that can be serialized over the wire, such as ints, floats, and strings).
Writing execution algorithms
To implement a custom execution algorithm you must define a class which inherits from ExecAlgorithm
.
An execution algorithm is a type of Actor
, so it's capable of the following:
- Request and subscribe to data
- Access the
Cache
- Set time alerts and/or timers using a
Clock
Additionally it can:
- Access the central
Portfolio
- Spawn secondary orders from a received primary (original) order
Once an execution algorithm is registered, and the system is running, it will receive orders off the
messages bus which are addressed to its ExecAlgorithmId
via the exec_algorithm_id
order parameter.
The order may also carry the exec_algorithm_params
being a dict[str, Any]
.
Because of the flexibility of the exec_algorithm_params
dictionary. It's important to thoroughly
validate all of the key value pairs for correct operation of the algorithm (for starters that the
dictionary is not None
and all necessary parameters actually exist).
Received orders will arrive via the following on_order(...)
method. These received orders are
know as "primary" (original) orders when being handled by an execution algorithm.
from nautilus_trader.model.orders.base import Order
def on_order(self, order: Order) -> None:
# Handle the order here
When the algorithm is ready to spawn a secondary order, it can use one of the following methods:
spawn_market(...)
(spawns aMARKET
order)spawn_market_to_limit(...)
(spawns aMARKET_TO_LIMIT
order)spawn_limit(...)
(spawns aLIMIT
order)
Additional order types will be implemented in future versions, as the need arises.
Each of these methods takes the primary (original) Order
as the first argument. The primary order
quantity will be reduced by the quantity
passed in (becoming the spawned orders quantity).
There must be enough primary order quantity remaining (this is validated).
Once the desired number of secondary orders have been spawned, and the execution routine is over, the intention is that the algorithm will then finally send the primary (original) order.
Spawned orders
All secondary orders spawned from an execution algorithm will carry a exec_spawn_id
which is
simply the ClientOrderId
of the primary (original) order, and whose client_order_id
derives from this original identifier with the following convention:
exec_spawn_id
(primary orderclient_order_id
value)spawn_sequence
(the sequence number for the spawned order)
{exec_spawn_id}-E{spawn_sequence}
e.g. O-20230404-001-000-E1
(for the first spawned order)
The "primary" and "secondary" / "spawn" terminology was specifically chosen to avoid conflict or confusion with the "parent" and "child" contingent orders terminology (an execution algorithm may also deal with contingent orders).
Managing execution algorithm orders
The Cache
provides several methods to aid in managing (keeping track of) the activity of
an execution algorithm. Calling the below method will return all execution algorithm orders
for the given query filters.
def orders_for_exec_algorithm(
self,
exec_algorithm_id: ExecAlgorithmId,
venue: Venue | None = None,
instrument_id: InstrumentId | None = None,
strategy_id: StrategyId | None = None,
side: OrderSide = OrderSide.NO_ORDER_SIDE,
) -> list[Order]:
As well as more specifically querying the orders for a certain execution series/spawn.
Calling the below method will return all orders for the given exec_spawn_id
(if found).
def orders_for_exec_spawn(self, exec_spawn_id: ClientOrderId) -> list[Order]:
This also includes the primary (original) order.
Execution reconciliation
Execution reconciliation is the process of aligning the external state of reality for orders and positions
(both closed and open) with the current system internal state built from events.
This process is primarily applicable to live trading, which is why only the LiveExecutionEngine
has reconciliation capability.
There are two main scenarios for reconciliation:
- Previous Cached Execution State: Where cached execution state exists, information from reports is used to generate missing events to align the state
- No Previous Cached Execution State: Where there is no cached state, all orders and positions that exist externally are generated from scratch
Reconciliation configuration
Unless reconciliation is disabled by setting the reconciliation
configuration parameter to false,
the execution engine will perform the execution reconciliation procedure for each venue.
Additionally, you can specify the lookback window for reconciliation by setting the reconciliation_lookback_mins
configuration parameter.
It's recommended not to set a specific reconciliation_lookback_mins
. This allows the requests made
to the venues to utilize the maximum execution history available for reconciliation.
If executions have occurred prior to the lookback window, any necessary events will be generated to align internal and external states. This may result in some information loss that could have been avoided with a longer lookback window.
Additionally, some venues may filter or drop execution information under certain conditions, resulting in further information loss. This would not occur if all events were persisted in the cache database.
Each strategy can also be configured to claim any external orders for an instrument ID generated during
reconciliation using the external_order_claims
configuration parameter.
This is useful in situations where, at system start, there is no cached state or it is desirable for
a strategy to resume its operations and continue managing existing open orders at the venue for an instrument.
See the LiveExecEngineConfig
API Reference for further details.
Reconciliation procedure
The reconciliation procedure is standardized for all adapter execution clients and uses the following methods to produce an execution mass status:
generate_order_status_reports
generate_fill_reports
generate_position_status_reports
The system state is then reconciled with the reports, which represent the external reality:
- Duplicate Check:
- Check for duplicate order IDs and trade IDs
- Order Reconciliation:
- Generate and apply events necessary to update orders from any cached state to the current state
- If any trade reports are missing, inferred
OrderFilled
events are generated - If any client order ID is not recognized or an order report lacks a client order ID, external order events are generated
- Position Reconciliation:
- Ensure the net position per instrument matches the position reports returned from the venue
- If the position state resulting from order reconciliation does not match the external state, external order events will be generated to resolve discrepancies
If reconciliation fails, the system will not continue to start, and an error will be logged.
The current reconciliation procedure can experience state mismatches if the lookback window is misconfigured or if the venue omits certain order or trade reports due to filter conditions.
If you encounter reconciliation issues, drop any cached state or ensure the account is flat at system shutdown and startup.